Welcome to the homepage of Dr Steffen Ducheyne [1], Postdoctoral Research Fellow of the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO). On 1st March 2006 I took my PhD (entitled: Virtuosi at Work: Historical-philosophical Essays on Causality and Methodology in the Natural Philosophy of Galileo, Huygens and Newton [2]) at Ghent University (Faculty of Arts and Philosophy > Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences > Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science). Starting from October 2006, my three-year post-doctoral project entitled “Scientific and Philosophical Methodologies in a Post-Newtonian World”, where I focus on J.S. Mill and W. Whewell primarily, is funded by the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO). I am also associated with the Centre for History of Science [3] and the Centre for History of Philosophy.

 

 

Contact Information:

Dr. Steffen Ducheyne

Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science

Blandijnberg 2, room 2.26

B-9000 Ghent, BELGIUM

Phone: ++32 (0) 9 264 39 79; Fax: ++32 (0) 9 264 41 87

 

 

§ 1. Professional Interests:

 

§ 1.1. History of Science:

Newton’s philosophia naturalis and its eighteenth-century legacy

The” “Scientific Revolution” (historiography and conceptual issues)

History of scientific methodology

Whewell

 

§ 1.2. Philosophy of Science:

Scientific methodology

Induction

Representation and models in science

 

§ 1.3. Early Modern Philosophy:

Early modern philosophy (especially Bacon, Hume, Reid, Kant, etc.)

Origins and evolution of empiricism

History of the philosophy of science

Philosophy of induction (Bacon, Hume, Newton, Reid, Whewell, Mill, etc.)

 

§ 1.4. Miscellanea:

Paul Otlet (1868-1944), the Belgian pioneer of information science

 

 

§ 2. Selected Representative Publications:

 

 

Note that the full version of papers marked with a “* can be found by going to http://logica.ugent.be/centrum/writings/pubs.php and then selecting my name. Other papers can be requested by simply e-mailing me.

 

§ 2.1. Articles:

 

Ducheyne, Steffen {2005}. “Newton’s Notion and Practice of Unification*”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A, 36 (1), pp. 61-78.

{2005}. “Mathematical Models in Newton’s Principia: A New View of the Newtonian Style*”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 19(1), pp. 1-19.

{2005}. “Newton’s Training in the Aristotelian Textbook Tradition: From Effects to Causes and Back*”, History of Science, 43(3), pp. 217-237.

 {2005}. “Michele Camerota's New Biography of Galileo: Three Essay Reviews, Review Essay III”, Early Science and Medicine, 10(4), pp. 560-565. [Review I by M. Finocchiaro; review II by P. Palmieri.]

{2005}. “Paul Otlet’s Theory of Knowledge and Linguistic Objectivism”, Knowledge Organization, 32 (3): pp. 110-116.

{2006}. “Lessons from Galileo: The Pragmatic Model of Shared Characteristics of Scientific Representation”, Philosophia Naturalis, 43(1), pp. 214-234.

{2006}. Newton's Onto-theology versus Descartes' and Leibniz': Or on the Relevance of Unificatory Tendencies in the Secularization-process”, Theology and Science, 4(1), pp. 71-85.

{2006}. Reid’s Adaptation and Radicalization of Newton’s Natural Philosophy as an Anticipation of Positivism”, History of European Ideas, 32, pp. 173-189.

{2006}. On Optical and Mechanical Models: Newton's Failure to Construct a Satisfactory Theory of the Phenomena of Light and Colour”, Logique et Analyse, 194, pp. 199-223.

{2006}. “Galileo's Interventionist Notion of "Cause"”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 67(3), pp. 443-464.

{2006}. “J.B. Van Helmont and the Question of Experimental Modernism*”, Physis: Rivista Internazionale di Storia della Scienza, vol. XLII, 2005, pp. 305-332. [appeared 2007]

{2006}. “The Argument(s) for Universal Gravitation*”, Foundations of Science, 11(4), pp. 419-447.

{2006}. “Ascribing Contemporary Scientific Concepts to Past Thinkers, Towards a Frame-work for Handling Matters More Precisely”, Scientia Poetica, Jahrbuch für Geschichte der Literatur und der Wissenschaften,  Band 10, pp. 274-290]

{2006}, The General Scholium: Some notes on Newton’s published and unpublished endeavours*, Lias: Sources and Documents Relating to the Early Modern History of Ideas, vol.33(2), pp. 223-274.

{2007}. “Johannes Baptista Van Helmonts experimentele praktijk: Een poging tot karakterisering”, Gewina, Tijdschrift voor de Geschiedenis der Geneeskunde, Natuurwetenschappen, Wiskunde en Techniek, 31(1), pp. 11-25.

{2007}.  Whewell over Noodzakelijkheid: Een systematische studie en propedeuse tot haar historische ontwikkeling”, Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 70 (2) (June), pp. 239-266 [in Dutch].

{July 2007}. “Huygens’s Understanding of Trajectories: Via media between Galileo and Newton”, Historia Scientiarum, International Journal of the History of Science Society of Japan, vol. 17(2).

& Erik Weber {2007}, “The Concept of Causation in Newton's Mechanical and Optical Work*, Logic and Logical Philosophy vol. 16, pp. 265-288.

Steffen Ducheyne {2007}, “Algunas notas Metodológicas sobre los Experimentos de J.B. Van Helmont*, Azogue, Revista electrónica dedicada al estudio histórico crítico de la alquimia, vol. 5, pp. 75-82.

{2007}. ““Ignorance is Bliss”: On Bernard Nieuwentijt's Doctrina Ignorantia and His Contribution Our Understanding of Scientific Idealisation, Rivista di storia della filosofia, vol. 62(4), pp. 699-710.

{2008}. Entry “J.B. Van Helmont” in: Angela Pilchak (ed.), New Dictionary of Scientific Biography (Detroit e.a., Thomson Gale: 2008), volume III, pp. 277-281].

{2008}. “J.B. Van Helmont’s De Tempore as an Influence on Isaac Newton’s Doctrine of Absolute Time”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. 90(2), 2008, pp. 216-228.

{2008}. “A Prelimary study of the Appropriation of Van Helmont’s Œuvre in Britain in Chymistry, Medicine and Natural Philosophy”, Ambix, vol. 55(2), 2008, pp. 122-135.

{2008}.Galileo and Huygens on Free Fall: Mathematical and Methodological Differences”, Dynamis, vol. 28, 2008, pp. 243-274.

{2008}. “Towards an Ontology for Scientific Models”, Metaphysica: International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics vol. 9(1), 2008, pp. 119-127.

{2008}. “J.S. Mill’s Canons of Induction; From true causes to provisional ones*, History and Philosophy of Logic, vol. 29(4), 2008, pp. 361-376.

{2008}. “Whewell's Metaphorical Usage of Light”, Semiotica, Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies, vol. 172(1), pp. 269-278.

{2008}. “Some Worries for J.D. Norton’s Material Theory of Induction*”, Philosophia Naturalis, vol. 45(1), 2008.

{forthcoming 2009}. ““To treat of the World”: Paul Otlet's Epistemology and Ontology and the Circle of Knowledge”, Journal of Documentation, vol. 65(2).

{forthcoming 2009}. “Kant and Whewell on bridging principles between metaphysics and science*, Kant Studien, vol. 100(1). [NEW]

{forthcoming, 2009/10}. “Whewell, Necessity and the Inductive Sciences”, South African Journal of Philosophy. [NEW]

{forthcoming, 2009}. “Fundamental Questions and Some New Answers on Philosophical, Contextual and Scientific Whewell: Some Reflections on Recent Whewell Scholarship and the Progress made therein”, Perspectives on Science. [NEW]

{forthcoming, 2009}. “Newtonianism in Locke, Hume, and Reid: or, How far can one stretch a label?”, Enlightenment and Dissent - Special Issue on Isaac Newton and Eighteenth-Century Thought, Stephen D. Snobelen (ed.), vol. 25, 2009. [NEW]

{2009}. “Anti-trintarianism in Newton’s General Scholium to the Principia, European Journal of Science and Theology, vol. 5(1), 2009, pp. 29-39. [NEW]

{2009}. “The Flow of Influence: From Newton to Locke … and Back”, Rivista di storia della filosofia, vol. 64(2), 2009, pp. 265-288. [NEW]

{2009}. “Newton's Theology and the Flow of Influence”, in: S. Ducheyne (ed.), Future Perspectives on Newton Scholarship and the Newtonian Legacy ... (KVAB, Brussel), 2009, pp. 35-47.  [NEW]

{2009}. “Isaac Newton’s ‘Of the Church’: Manuscript Description and Analysis of Bodmer Ms. in Geneva”, European Journal of Science and Theology, vol. 5(2), 2009, pp. 25-35. [NEW]

{in press}. Whewells “Tidal Researches: Scientific Practise and Philosophical Methodology*”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A. [NEW]

 

 

               § 2.2. Reviews in:

 

Philosophy of Science (1), Annals of Science (4), Ambix (2), Isis (2), Algemeen Nederland Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte (1), Early Science and Medicine (1), Knowledge organization (1), British Journal for the History of Philosophy (1), Eighteenth-Century Studies (3), Archives internationales d’histoire des sciences (1).

 

 

§ 2.3. Editorship:

 

(appeared in 2007), “The Challenges for Early Modern Philosophy”, Philosophica 76, 2005, pp. 135. Full text of this issue is available here.

 (to appear early 2009), Future Perspectives on Newton Scholarship and the Newtonian Legacy in Eighteenth-century Science and Philosophy Europe”, Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België voor Wetenschappen en Kunsten. This is a collection of papers presented at a contact-forum funded by the Royal Academy on 28 September 2007. Click here for the corresponding piece which appeared in the newspaper De Standaard (in Dutch).

 

§ 2.4. Organization of Conferences:

 

See 2.3, 2.

"Induction: Historical and Contemporary Approaches" (8th-10/11th July 2008, Ghent) [website]. A conference report appeared in The Reasoner, vol. 2(10), 2008, pp. 8-9.

 

 

§ 3. Informatie voor Studenten (in Dutch)

 

Thesisonderwerpen

Alle cursusmateriaal bij Wetenschapsgeschiendenis, potentiële examenvragen, de slides van de colleges, de vragen bij “Kennis ontrafeld” zijn beschikbaar op Minerva.

Spreekuur: altijd op afspraak via e-mail of 09/264.39.79.

 



[1] Me, punting the Cam.                           

                                       

[2] Announced in History of Science Society Newsletter, vol. 35 (3) (July 2006), p. 16. In the reading committee were Prof. dr. Erik Weber, Prof. dr. Joke Meheus, Prof. dr. Diderik Batens, Prof. dr. Henk de Regt, and Prof. dr. Eric Schliesser.

 

[3] The reason for this is that I believe that philosophy and history of science can learn much from each other. Some of my favourite quotes in this area are: “For the historian formal philosophical analyses are often empty. For the philosopher the historian’s factual compendia seem blind.” (Hanson, 1962: 582 [a nice reinterpretation of Bacon’s and Kant’s ideas]) and “My aim is simultaneously historical and philosophical: for I believe that understanding of the issues controlling particular investigations is a necessary condition for understanding of the issues of understanding inquiry (data for the philosophy of science can come only from the history of science); and I believe that a clear appreciation of the content of the science we possess – itself, in my view, a primary object of the philosophy of science – is facilitated by, in practice even perhaps impossible without, some attention to the routes by which that science has been acquired.” (Stein, 1970: 265).

 

 

Last update: 9 February 2009.